Selasa, 19 November 2013
100 top motion on the debate
Rank Total views Debate Motion
1 124,191 This House would ban animal testing
2 110,369 This House believes single-sex schools are good for education
3 86,928 This house would raise the legal driving age to 18
4 81,440 This House believes reality television does more harm than good
5 80,053 This House supports the death penalty
6 79,846 This house Would Ban School Uniforms - Junior
7 73,949 This House believes the internet brings more harm than good
8 65,199 This House would ban homework
9 59,184 This House believes that children should be allowed to own and use mobile phones.
10 57,755 This house believes that capitalism is better than socialism
11 55,092 This House Believes that assisted suicide should be legalized
12 54,577 This House believes university education should be free
13 47,946 This house would ban cosmetic surgery
14 47,061 This House would ban junk food from schools.
15 45,148 This House would Censor the Internet
16 44,372 This House believes that cannabis should be legalised
17 42,006 This House believes wild animals should not be kept in captivity
18 39,527 This House believes homosexuals should be able to adopt.
19 38,346 This House would permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports
20 37,397 This House believes mothers should stay at home and look after their children.
21 36,884 This house would make physical education compulsory
22 36,496 This House would ban the sale of violent video games/censor violent video games.
23 36,274 This House would ban boxing.
24 35,289 This House believes science is a threat to humanity
25 34,899 This House believes that advertising is harmful
26 34,320 This House would give illegal immigrants drivers licenses
27 34,105 This House would limit the right to bear arms
28 33,996 This house Would reintroduce Corporal Punishment in Schools
29 33,267 This house would allow gay couples to marry
1 124,191 This House would ban animal testing
2 110,369 This House believes single-sex schools are good for education
3 86,928 This house would raise the legal driving age to 18
4 81,440 This House believes reality television does more harm than good
5 80,053 This House supports the death penalty
6 79,846 This house Would Ban School Uniforms - Junior
7 73,949 This House believes the internet brings more harm than good
8 65,199 This House would ban homework
9 59,184 This House believes that children should be allowed to own and use mobile phones.
10 57,755 This house believes that capitalism is better than socialism
11 55,092 This House Believes that assisted suicide should be legalized
12 54,577 This House believes university education should be free
13 47,946 This house would ban cosmetic surgery
14 47,061 This House would ban junk food from schools.
15 45,148 This House would Censor the Internet
16 44,372 This House believes that cannabis should be legalised
17 42,006 This House believes wild animals should not be kept in captivity
18 39,527 This House believes homosexuals should be able to adopt.
19 38,346 This House would permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports
20 37,397 This House believes mothers should stay at home and look after their children.
21 36,884 This house would make physical education compulsory
22 36,496 This House would ban the sale of violent video games/censor violent video games.
23 36,274 This House would ban boxing.
24 35,289 This House believes science is a threat to humanity
25 34,899 This House believes that advertising is harmful
26 34,320 This House would give illegal immigrants drivers licenses
27 34,105 This House would limit the right to bear arms
28 33,996 This house Would reintroduce Corporal Punishment in Schools
29 33,267 This house would allow gay couples to marry
leader of opp.
•Provides a clash, negation, or maintain status quo
•Provides their team split
•Provides constructive matter and argumentation based on their clash
*AREAS OF REBUTTAL
1.FACTUAL ERRORS
2.LOGICAL ERRORS (No links)
3.LOGIC is sound but the argument does not resolve the issue
4.Faulty Premises
- Provide Comparative analysis that allows your team to surpass the other’s argument
5.Breaking deadlocks
*CLASH
•COUNTER POLICY
- Oppose the proposition and provide an alternative resolution to the problem
•STATUS QUO IS WORKABLE OR SELF-CORRECTING
- The clamor by government is exaggerated, unnecessary, and even if there was a problem it is already self-correcting
•COUNTER – VALUE
- There are other values worth protecting
- Make a comparative analysis of social values of course
*CONSTRUCTIVE VS NEGATIVE MATTER
•CONTRUCTIVE MATTER argues on the merits of a value or proposal
•NEGATIVE MATTER merely negates a value or proposal
•A DEBATE has an equal burden of constructive matter imposed on both sides
•A mere rebuttal case therefore cannot merit a win for a team
prime minister on debate
Prime Minister
Provides the set-up of the Debate
•Definition and Context
(preferably non-literal)
•Parameters
•Problem
(or at least the value to be appraised)
•Standards and goals
(preferably expressly stated)
•Policy and Mechanisms
(For a policy debate)
•Team Split (very brief please)
•Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments
1.LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase)
Clarify your premise if you need to
2. HOW?
3. WHY?
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)
5. EXAMPLE
Provides the set-up of the Debate
•Definition and Context
(preferably non-literal)
•Parameters
•Problem
(or at least the value to be appraised)
•Standards and goals
(preferably expressly stated)
•Policy and Mechanisms
(For a policy debate)
•Team Split (very brief please)
•Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments
1.LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase)
Clarify your premise if you need to
2. HOW?
3. WHY?
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)
5. EXAMPLE
prime minister on debate
Prime Minister
Provides the set-up of the Debate
•Definition and Context
(preferably non-literal)
•Parameters
•Problem
(or at least the value to be appraised)
•Standards and goals
(preferably expressly stated)
•Policy and Mechanisms
(For a policy debate)
•Team Split (very brief please)
•Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments
1.LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase)
Clarify your premise if you need to
2. HOW?
3. WHY?
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)
5. EXAMPLE
Provides the set-up of the Debate
•Definition and Context
(preferably non-literal)
•Parameters
•Problem
(or at least the value to be appraised)
•Standards and goals
(preferably expressly stated)
•Policy and Mechanisms
(For a policy debate)
•Team Split (very brief please)
•Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments
1.LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase)
Clarify your premise if you need to
2. HOW?
3. WHY?
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)
5. EXAMPLE
prime minister on debate
Prime Minister
Provides the set-up of the Debate
•Definition and Context
(preferably non-literal)
•Parameters
•Problem
(or at least the value to be appraised)
•Standards and goals
(preferably expressly stated)
•Policy and Mechanisms
(For a policy debate)
•Team Split (very brief please)
•Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments
1.LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase)
Clarify your premise if you need to
2. HOW?
3. WHY?
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)
5. EXAMPLE
Provides the set-up of the Debate
•Definition and Context
(preferably non-literal)
•Parameters
•Problem
(or at least the value to be appraised)
•Standards and goals
(preferably expressly stated)
•Policy and Mechanisms
(For a policy debate)
•Team Split (very brief please)
•Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments
1.LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase)
Clarify your premise if you need to
2. HOW?
3. WHY?
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)
5. EXAMPLE
reply speech on debate
More often than not, reply speakers would just simply talk about how he/she felt the debate went through and why should the adjudicator give the win to their side (biased adjudication). Reply speech has no bearing to the adjudication’s decision but will affect the TOTAL TEAM SCORE. To put it simply, a reply speaker would say, “adjudicators, make my team win please.” or you can say "our team is reasonable to win "
lgbt 1
LGBT (atau GLBT) adalah sebuah akronim yang merupakan singkatan dari "lesbian, gay, biseksual, dan transgender". Istilah ini digunakan semenjak tahun 1990-an dan menggantikan frasa "komunitas gay"karena istilah ini lebih mewakili kelompok-kelompok yang telah disebutkan.
lgbt 2
Akronim ini dibuat dengan tujuan untuk menekankan keanekaragaman "budaya yang berdasarkan identitas seksualitas dan gender". Kadang-kadang istilah LGBT digunakan untuk semua orang yang tidak heteroseksual, bukan hanya homoseksual, biseksual, atau transgender. Maka dari itu, seringkali huruf Q ditambahkan agar queer dan orang-orang yang masih mempertanyakan identitas seksual mereka juga terwakili (contoh. "LGBTQ" atau "GLBTQ", tercatat semenjak tahun 1996).
lgbt 3
Istilah LGBT sangat banyak digunakan untuk penunjukkan diri. Istilah ini juga diterapkan oleh mayoritas komunitas dan media yang berbasis identitas seksualitas dan gender di Amerika Serikat dan beberapa negara berbahasa Inggris lainnya.
Tidak semua kelompok yang disebutkan setuju dengan akronim ini. Beberapa orang dalam kelompok yang disebutkan merasa tidak berhubungan dengan kelompok lain dan tidak menyukai penyeragaman ini. Beberapa orang tidak menyetujui bahwa sebab transgender dan transeksual itu sama dengan kaum "LGB".Gagasan tersebut jelas dalam keyakinan "separatisme lesbian & gay", yang meyakini bahwa kelompok lesbian dan gay harus dipisah satu sama lain. Ada pula yang tidak peduli karena mereka merasa bahwa: akronim ini secara politis terlalu benar; akronim LGBT merupakan sebuah upaya untuk mengategorikan berbagai kelompok dalam satu wilayah abu-abu; dan akronim ini berarti bahwa isu dan prioritas kelompok yang diwakili diberikan perhatian yang setara. Di sisi lain, kaum interseks ingin dimasukkan ke dalam kelompok LGBT untuk membentuk "LGBTI" (tercatat sejak tahun 1999). Akronim "LGBTI" digunakan dalam The Activist's Guide of the Yogyakarta Principles in Action.
COPIED BY : WIKIPEDIA
Gula Langka LIPI, Solusi bagi Penderita Diabetes
KOMPAS.com - Pusat Penelitian Bioteknologi Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) berhasil memproduksi jenis gula langka yang bakal jadi solusi bagi penderita diabetes. Gula langka itu bernama tagatosa.
"Tagatosa ini yang paling siap diadopsi oleh industri," ungkap Wien Kusharyoto, peneliti bioteknologi LIPI yang terlibat dalam pengembangan gula langka itu.
Gula langka berarti gula yang sebenarnya tidak terdapat di alam, harus dibuat di laboratorium. Tagatosa sendiri diperoleh dengan mengolah whey dari susu sapi yang punya kandungan galaktosa memakai enzim.
Di Belgia, produksi tagatosa sudah dilakukan secara massal oleh Nutrilab dengan kapasitan produksi hingga 10.000 ton per tahun.
"Di LIPI, kita menghasilkan tagatosa dengan enzom yang berbeda, yaitu arabinosa isomerase yang kita ambil dari geobaccillus," jelas Wien dalam acara open house yang digelar Pusat Penelitian Bioteknologi LIPI, Selasa (19/11/2013).
Wien menguraikan, tagatosa sudah siap diproduksi sendiri sebab enzim, bahan, dan proses yang diperlukan untuk menghasilkannya sudah diketahui dengan pasti.
"Tinggal sekarang bagaimana kesediaan industri untuk memastikan ketersediaan bahan bakunya. Kalau industri sanggup menyediakan bahan bakunya, tagatosa ini sebenarnya sudah diproduksi untuk masyarakat," katanya.
Wien menuturkan, tagatosa memiliki beberapa keunggulan dibanding gula biasa dan gula rendah kalori lain.
"Kalorinya hanya 1,5 kkal sementara gula pasir 4 kkal. Untuk kemanisannya, ini 92 persen kemanisan gula pasir. Yang paling penting juga adalah aftertaste, tagatosa tidak meninggalkan rasa pahit atau memicu rasa haus," papar Wien.
Tagatosa saat ini belum banyak dikenal oleh publik Indonesia. Karenanya, perlu dikenalkan sebagai alternatif gula rendah kalori yang bakal menjadi solusi bagai penderita diabetes.
"Tagatosa ini yang paling siap diadopsi oleh industri," ungkap Wien Kusharyoto, peneliti bioteknologi LIPI yang terlibat dalam pengembangan gula langka itu.
Gula langka berarti gula yang sebenarnya tidak terdapat di alam, harus dibuat di laboratorium. Tagatosa sendiri diperoleh dengan mengolah whey dari susu sapi yang punya kandungan galaktosa memakai enzim.
Di Belgia, produksi tagatosa sudah dilakukan secara massal oleh Nutrilab dengan kapasitan produksi hingga 10.000 ton per tahun.
"Di LIPI, kita menghasilkan tagatosa dengan enzom yang berbeda, yaitu arabinosa isomerase yang kita ambil dari geobaccillus," jelas Wien dalam acara open house yang digelar Pusat Penelitian Bioteknologi LIPI, Selasa (19/11/2013).
Wien menguraikan, tagatosa sudah siap diproduksi sendiri sebab enzim, bahan, dan proses yang diperlukan untuk menghasilkannya sudah diketahui dengan pasti.
"Tinggal sekarang bagaimana kesediaan industri untuk memastikan ketersediaan bahan bakunya. Kalau industri sanggup menyediakan bahan bakunya, tagatosa ini sebenarnya sudah diproduksi untuk masyarakat," katanya.
Wien menuturkan, tagatosa memiliki beberapa keunggulan dibanding gula biasa dan gula rendah kalori lain.
"Kalorinya hanya 1,5 kkal sementara gula pasir 4 kkal. Untuk kemanisannya, ini 92 persen kemanisan gula pasir. Yang paling penting juga adalah aftertaste, tagatosa tidak meninggalkan rasa pahit atau memicu rasa haus," papar Wien.
Tagatosa saat ini belum banyak dikenal oleh publik Indonesia. Karenanya, perlu dikenalkan sebagai alternatif gula rendah kalori yang bakal menjadi solusi bagai penderita diabetes.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)