•Provides a clash, negation, or maintain status quo
•Provides their team split
•Provides constructive matter and argumentation based on their clash
*AREAS OF REBUTTAL
1.FACTUAL ERRORS
2.LOGICAL ERRORS (No links)
3.LOGIC is sound but the argument does not resolve the issue
4.Faulty Premises
- Provide Comparative analysis that allows your team to surpass the other’s argument
5.Breaking deadlocks
*CLASH
•COUNTER POLICY
- Oppose the proposition and provide an alternative resolution to the problem
•STATUS QUO IS WORKABLE OR SELF-CORRECTING
- The clamor by government is exaggerated, unnecessary, and even if there was a problem it is already self-correcting
•COUNTER – VALUE
- There are other values worth protecting
- Make a comparative analysis of social values of course
*CONSTRUCTIVE VS NEGATIVE MATTER
•CONTRUCTIVE MATTER argues on the merits of a value or proposal
•NEGATIVE MATTER merely negates a value or proposal
•A DEBATE has an equal burden of constructive matter imposed on both sides
•A mere rebuttal case therefore cannot merit a win for a team
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar